๐Ÿšจ HOLY CRAP! Bill Gates’ Ex-Wife Demands He Answer Questions About… ๐Ÿ‘‰

ADVERTISEMENT

She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.

โ€œEven if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,โ€ Luna told Fox News. โ€œWe have been more than patient.โ€

These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epsteinโ€™s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.

Lunaโ€™s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.

The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJโ€™s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.

โ€œThe Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,โ€ Luna said. โ€œThis is corruption at the highest level.โ€

Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. โ€œHad this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,โ€ one conservative commentator noted.

For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within Americaโ€™s elite circles. The financierโ€™s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.

Now, Lunaโ€™s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.

Whatโ€™s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individualsโ€”politicians, celebrities, and global financiersโ€”who participated in or enabled Epsteinโ€™s crimes.

Leave a Comment