ABC Anchor Admits Truth As Trump’s DC Crackdown Yields Big Results

Trump’s decision to intervene federally was controversial precisely because it challenged the status quo. Critics argued that crime was already declining, that local leaders should retain control, and that federal involvement risked undermining civil liberties. Supporters countered that incremental approaches had failed and that extraordinary circumstances required decisive action.

What followed was one of the most aggressive law-enforcement coordination efforts the city had seen in decades. Federal agencies increased their presence. Task forces targeted violent offenders and organized crime networks. Patrol visibility surged. And crucially, consequences returned to the system.